The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Download decision recordAdd or change routes →

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldFree accountSewportGlobalRemoveOpen accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemoveOpen accessSample Review & Approval RecordGlobalRemoveOpen accessHook & Needle Diameter ReferenceGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobSource productionSource productionSource productionLearn techniques
AreaProductionProductionProductionYarn
Best forRequesting apparel-production proposalsUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workApproving a named sample without accidentally approving bulkChecking which U.S. alias the current Craft Yarn Council table gives a known metric package size before confirming project gauge
Know before usingA profile, proposal, match, or escrow status does not establish factory ownership, identity, capacity, workmanship, quality systems, labour or chemical compliance, delivery performance, contract enforceability, or project fit. Verify the legal and production entities, references, site and subcontracting, samples, compliance evidence, specifications, terms, and remedies directly.An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.The record does not validate every size or user, prove bulk conformity, prescribe universal defect classes or AQL, replace testing or inspection, or establish compliance.The reference is not a dimensional measurement, manufacturer inspection, UK or Canadian conversion, steel-hook chart, tool recommendation, yarn assignment, gauge result, or proof that a proposed tool will produce the required fabric.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsApparel brandsApparel brandsMakers
Location or jurisdictionGlobalGlobalGlobalGlobal
AccessFree accountOpen accessOpen accessOpen access
FormatMarketplaceStitch AuthorityStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source typeCommercial marketplaceStitch AuthorityStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesSewport's current brand workflow starts with an account and guided project enquiry, then exposes proposals from garment factories and production specialists. The platform tells brands to compare profiles, portfolios, location, price, and communication, then record service, delivery, payment, and contract terms in a formal proposal. Its service-provider workflow includes factories, sample studios, pattern cutters, tech-pack makers, sourcing specialists, and material suppliers, with optional split-payment escrow.The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions.The record applies version and lot controls from textile testing plus current ISO and ASQ acceptance-sampling boundaries to separate sample approval from bulk release.The lookup reproduces the current public Craft Yarn Council metric and U.S. alias rows and follows the Council's warning that company letter and number labels vary; blank aliases remain blank instead of being inferred.
Linked page reviewedJul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026Jul 15, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueJan 17, 2027Jul 16, 2027Jul 15, 2027Jul 16, 2027
Inspect
Open record →Source page ↗
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Open resource →
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.