Related sitesRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

This is a working table, not a ranking, recommendation, or provider approval.

Selected resources

3 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 3 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessQUT TextileR Knowledge BaseAustralia · OceaniaRemoveOpen accessPattern Grading & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemoveFree downloadSeamly2DGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobChoose materialsFind patterns & fitFind patterns & fit
Also useful forNo additional job recordedNo additional job recordedNo additional job recorded
AreaMaterialsPatterns & fitPatterns & fit
Best forComparing common fibre types and blends by typical use and care before choosing a project material, then following the cited source when the decision needs testing or current claim evidenceAuditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidenceDigital pattern drafting
Know before usingThis is a general educational reference, not a neutral material ranking, complete fibre encyclopedia, specification, test report, sourcing database, lifecycle assessment, certification, safety procedure, or proof of a product claim. Coverage and citation depth vary by page, and some environmental, care, performance, or end-of-life statements are broad. Fibre name alone does not establish a fabric's construction, blend percentage, finish, quality, behavior, or suitability. Confirm the exact composition, construction, finish, care label, sample behavior, test evidence, certification scope, and project requirements with the responsible supplier, scheme, laboratory, or specialist.The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review.Patternmaking knowledge, controlled measurement files, production conventions, and sewn fit testing are still required. The software does not validate body measurements, ease, balance, grading rules, fabric behavior, construction, or product fit. The project currently labels its user wiki manual as needing updates, so confirm current commands and file behavior against the installed release and active support channels.
Practical access
ForBothApparel brandsBoth
Location or jurisdictionAustralia · OceaniaGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessOpen accessFree download
FormatReferenceStitch AuthoritySoftware
Source typeFirst-party platformStitch AuthorityOpen-source project
Source and review
What the source establishesThe live QUT index says the knowledge base is designed to help users choose an appropriate textile and extend garment use. It links 14 topics: nine named fibre pages, textile blends, re-making, reuse, recycling, and repair. Checked silk, polyester, wool, and blend pages organize information under overview, common fabrics, context of use, care, recycling, and further reading where applicable. QUT identifies TextileR as a research group and publishes named researchers, publications, objectives, and a direct contact.The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments.The maintained Seamly2D repository identifies the application as GPLv3+ open-source patternmaking software for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It reads multi-size measurement files for standardized sizes and individual measurement files for custom-fit work, publishes downloadable builds and releases, and links an active website and user forum.
Linked page reviewedJul 26, 2026Jul 27, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Next review dueJan 22, 2027Jul 27, 2027Jan 17, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.

Open the maintained platform access map →