Related sitesRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

This is a working table, not a ranking, recommendation, or provider approval.

Selected resources

3 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 3 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessAustralia Care Labelling OverviewAustralia · OceaniaRemoveOpen accessPattern Grading & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemoveOpen accessYarn Database EU Dyers and MakersEuropean UnionRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobCheck standardsFind patterns & fitChoose materials
Also useful forNo additional job recordedNo additional job recordedNo additional job recorded
AreaStandardsPatterns & fitYarn
Best forGetting an accessible Australian care-labelling overview before opening the registered legal instrument and any incorporated standard needed for the productAuditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidenceFinding independent EU yarn or fibre dyers with off-Ravelry purchase routes
Know before usingThe ACCC explicitly describes this page as an overview that suppliers must not use as a complete compliance guide. It is not the registered instrument or the full licensed text of AS/NZS 1957:1998 or ISO 3758:2012, and it does not classify a product, select or approve instructions, or cover fibre content, origin, children's nightwear, chemicals, general product safety, every state or territory issue, or legal advice. Check the current instrument, exact product scope and exemptions, incorporated text, label execution, related rules, records, and enforcement guidance before supply.The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review.It is one curator's intentionally selective, off-Ravelry-oriented database, inventories change, and paid supporters can receive rotating priority placement; verify availability, fibre claims, shipping, and terms directly.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsApparel brandsMakers
Location or jurisdictionAustralia · OceaniaGlobalEuropean Union
AccessOpen accessOpen accessOpen access
FormatReferenceStitch AuthorityDirectory
Source typeGovernment guidanceStitch AuthorityCommunity database
Source and review
What the source establishesThe Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Product Safety page identifies the Consumer Goods (Care Labelling) Information Standard 2023 as the mandatory rule for prescribed clothing, household textiles, furnishings, bedding, piece goods, textile yarns, leather, fur, and other listed goods. It publishes the main exclusions, states that suppliers may use English care instructions, the five internationally recognised care symbols, or both, and links the registered instrument and explanatory statement. It also states that the rule draws on specified parts of AS/NZS 1957:1998 and ISO 3758:2012 and that non-compliance can lead to penalties or a recall obligation.The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments.The individually researched database offers free listings and sortable yarn, fibre, designer, editor, accessory, and location views; the EU page spans multiple countries and direct seller profiles.
Linked page reviewedJul 21, 2026Jul 27, 2026Jul 15, 2026
Next review dueOct 19, 2026Jul 27, 2027Jan 11, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.

Open the maintained platform access map →