Related sitesRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

This is a working table, not a ranking, recommendation, or provider approval.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessAFC Pattern Makers DirectoryAustralia · OceaniaRemoveFree downloadAFIRM Restricted Substances ListGlobalRemoveOpen accessTech Pack Definition, Contents & LimitsGlobalRemoveOpen accessPattern Grading & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobFind patterns & fitCheck standardsSource productionFind patterns & fit
Also useful forNo additional job recordedNo additional job recordedNo additional job recordedNo additional job recorded
AreaPatterns & fitStandardsProductionPatterns & fit
Best forStarting an Australian patternmaker shortlist by service and location before checking scope, files, fit process, and availability directlyBuilding a product chemical-restriction baselineUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workAuditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidence
Know before usingThis is a task-specific route inside the existing AFC industry directory, not an independent provider census or a second operator. A category, profile, location, member filter, service description, or AFC membership does not establish identity, qualifications, current availability, product experience, fit quality, grading accuracy, file compatibility, ownership terms, capacity, pricing, subcontracting, or project fit. Confirm the legal and working party, the individual responsible, relevant product examples and references, base-pattern and size-chart inputs, fit and grading method, sample rounds, CAD system and version, required file outputs, intellectual-property and revision terms, schedule, fees, and remedies directly.AFIRM states that its list is guidance, not legal advice, an industry standard of care, or a guarantee of completeness or brand acceptance. It does not replace current law, a customer's stricter RSL, manufacturing-input controls, a product-specific risk and sampling plan, accepted laboratory methods, supplier controls, or performance and safety testing.An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsApparel brandsApparel brandsApparel brands
Location or jurisdictionAustralia · OceaniaGlobalGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessFree downloadOpen accessOpen access
FormatDirectoryReferenceStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source typeIndustry organizationIndustry organizationStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesThe Australian Fashion Council directory exposes Pattern Makers as a dedicated Design and Technical category. The live category page publishes named profiles with company-supplied service descriptions, Australian locations, websites or contact routes where supplied, and an AFC-member filter. Checked profiles described combinations of manual or digital patternmaking, grading, fit sessions, technical design, tech packs, sampling, markers, and production support. The parent directory also publishes a route for businesses to request inclusion.AFIRM's current About page identifies the Apparel and Footwear International RSL Management Group as a member-driven organization collaborating on chemicals management and assigns annual RSL maintenance to its RSL Committee. AFIRM publishes a 2026 multilingual Restricted Substances List for chemicals in finished apparel, footwear, accessories, and related materials, with a material-specific testing matrix. Its FAQ says the list does not cover product-performance testing, distinguishes the finished-product RSL from manufacturing-input lists, and tells suppliers to check each customer's brand-specific requirements and testing acceptance.The guide cites published ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it discloses that ISO 10013:2021's 2026 systematic review is at close-of-review stage and separates every cited authority from product-specific technical and market decisions.The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments.
Linked page reviewedJul 26, 2026Jul 30, 2026Jul 27, 2026Jul 27, 2026
Next review dueJan 22, 2027Oct 28, 2026Jul 27, 2027Jul 27, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.

Open the maintained platform access map →