The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Download decision recordAdd or change routes →

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessYarnSubGlobalRemoveOpen accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemoveOpen accessApparel Grade-Rule & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemoveOpen accessPattern Grader Hiring BriefGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobChoose materialsSource productionFind patterns & fitFind patterns & fit
AreaYarnProductionPatterns & fitPatterns & fit
Best forReplacing a discontinued or unavailable yarnUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workAuditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidenceScoping and accepting freelance pattern-grading work
Know before usingA suggested match is a data-based shortlist, not proof that the yarn suits the pattern or maker. Yarn records can be incomplete or wrong, prices and availability vary by market, and the site uses affiliate links. Confirm the required gauge, total length, fibre behavior, construction, care, color, dye lot, accessibility, and seller terms, then make and assess a representative swatch before committing.An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review.The brief does not approve a base pattern, size system, grade rule, pattern, file, provider, contract, classification, fee, fit, sample plan, production use, or intellectual-property position, and it does not replace qualified pattern, fit, CAD, employment, tax, privacy, and legal review.
Practical access
ForMakersApparel brandsApparel brandsApparel brands
Location or jurisdictionGlobalGlobalGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessOpen accessOpen accessOpen access
FormatReferenceStitch AuthorityStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source typeFirst-party platformStitch AuthorityStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesYarnSub's official FAQ says its matching software compares gauge, texture, yarn weight and density, fibre content, and fibre qualities such as drape and softness. Discontinued yarns remain searchable as starting points but are excluded from suggested replacements, and each yarn page provides a route to report source-data problems.The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions.The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments.The source-reviewed brief cites current U.S. Department of Labor task and title evidence, ISO documented-information, size-designation, body-table, and garment-measurement sources, first-party CAD exchange guidance, and one professional discovery route; it requires controlled inputs, explicit authority, receiver-tested files, sewn evidence, and acceptance records.
Linked page reviewedJul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueJan 17, 2027Jul 16, 2027Jul 16, 2027Jul 16, 2027
Inspect
Open record →Source page ↗
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Open resource →
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.