The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessYarn Database EU Dyers and MakersEuropean UnionRemoveFree downloadSeamly2DGlobalRemoveFree + paidPattern TestersGlobalRemoveOpen accessFabric Purchase PlannerGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobChoose materialsFind patterns & fitFind patterns & fitChoose materials
AreaYarnPatterns & fitPatterns & fitMaterials
Best forFinding independent EU yarn or fibre dyers with off-Ravelry purchase routesDigital pattern draftingCoordinating an independent sewing-pattern testDocumenting how a pattern-based fabric quantity becomes an order length
Know before usingIt is one curator's intentionally selective, off-Ravelry-oriented database, inventories change, and paid supporters can receive rotating priority placement; verify availability, fibre claims, shipping, and terms directly.Patternmaking knowledge, controlled measurement files, production conventions, and sewn fit testing are still required. The software does not validate body measurements, ease, balance, grading rules, fabric behavior, construction, or product fit. The project currently labels its user wiki manual as needing updates, so confirm current commands and file behavior against the installed release and active support channels.The interface and plan description do not prove tester reach, completion, feedback quality, fit validity, export quality, uptime, support, or suitability for an established release process. Measurements and photos can be sensitive personal data. Run a non-critical pilot, review the current privacy and service terms, define consent and photo rights, test exports and deletion, and keep pattern approval and release responsibility with the designer.The planner adds and rounds user-entered lengths; it does not create a cutting layout, infer shrinkage or matching allowances, compensate for a width change, establish usable width, or prove that the order quantity is sufficient.
Practical access
ForMakersBothApparel brandsMakers
Location or jurisdictionEuropean UnionGlobalGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessFree downloadFree + paidOpen access
FormatDirectorySoftwareSoftwareStitch Authority
Source typeCommunity databaseOpen-source projectFirst-party platformStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesThe individually researched database offers free listings and sortable yarn, fibre, designer, editor, accessory, and location views; the EU page spans multiple countries and direct seller profiles.The maintained Seamly2D repository identifies the application as GPLv3+ open-source patternmaking software for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It reads multi-size measurement files for standardized sizes and individual measurement files for custom-fit work, publishes downloadable builds and releases, and links an active website and user forum.Pattern Testers currently offers application intake, tester selection, feedback, photos, approvals, issue tracking, revisions, a reusable tester directory, and release deadlines. The public pricing page shows a limited free plan and paid Pro and Business tiers. Its June 2026 privacy policy lists names, email addresses, measurements, photos, feedback, application history, and assignments among the data processed.NIST defines 1 yard as exactly 0.9144 metre. Sewing & Craft Alliance guidance ties an applicable cutting layout to the exact view, size, fabric width, and nap condition and recommends layout work when listed conditions do not fit the project.
Linked page reviewedJul 15, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueJan 11, 2027Jan 17, 2027Jan 17, 2027Jul 16, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.