Compare two to four resources
Compare textile resources.
Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.
Selected resources
4 resources selected.
Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes
| Decision field | Open accessUK Textile Labelling GuidanceUnited Kingdom · Europe & MediterraneanRemove | Open accessPattern Test Brief TemplateGlobalRemove | Open accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemove | Free downloadSeamly2DGlobalRemove |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | ||||
| Primary job | Check standards | Find patterns & fit | Source production | Find patterns & fit |
| Area | Standards | Patterns & fit | Production | Patterns & fit |
| Best for | Starting a Great Britain textile-label compliance check | Planning a sewing, knitting, or crochet pattern test | Understanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing work | Digital pattern drafting |
| Know before using | The guide expressly excludes Northern Ireland and says only courts can authoritatively interpret the law. It is not the controlling legislation, an approved label, a product classification, or legal advice. Confirm current legislation and amendments, the exact product and exemptions, substantiated composition, responsible manufacturer or importer, online and physical presentation, and any other safety, chemicals, origin, care, or consumer-law duties. | The workflow is not a contract or quality certification; local legal duties and technical review may still apply. | An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority. | Patternmaking knowledge, controlled measurement files, production conventions, and sewn fit testing are still required. The software does not validate body measurements, ease, balance, grading rules, fabric behavior, construction, or product fit. The project currently labels its user wiki manual as needing updates, so confirm current commands and file behavior against the installed release and active support channels. |
| Practical access | ||||
| For | Apparel brands | Both | Apparel brands | Both |
| Location or jurisdiction | United Kingdom · Europe & Mediterranean | Global | Global | Global |
| Access | Open access | Open access | Open access | Free download |
| Format | Reference | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority | Software |
| Source type | Government guidance | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority | Open-source project |
| Source and review | ||||
| What the source establishes | Business Companion's July 2026 guide covers England, Scotland, and Wales. It explains fibre-content labels under the Textile Products Regulations and assimilated Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011, including permitted fibre names, products containing at least 80% textile fibres, components with different compositions, English-language and placement rules, non-textile animal-origin wording, and fibre information in catalogue and online sales. | The linked tool or guide is maintained inside Stitch Authority and was checked against its current public interface. | The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions. | The maintained Seamly2D repository identifies the application as GPLv3+ open-source patternmaking software for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It reads multi-size measurement files for standardized sizes and individual measurement files for custom-fit work, publishes downloadable builds and releases, and links an active website and user forum. |
| Linked page reviewed | Jul 21, 2026 | Jul 15, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| Next review due | Oct 19, 2026 | Jul 15, 2027 | Jul 16, 2027 | Jan 17, 2027 |
| Inspect | ||||
How to compare
Use the rows to narrow your next check.
- Choose resources that could solve the same job.
- Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
- Read each limitation before following the source.
- Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.