The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemoveFree accountWoolmark Learning CentreGlobalRemovePaidPatternLab LondonGlobalRemoveOpen accessFabric Mass Unit ConverterGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobSource productionLearn techniquesFind patterns & fitChoose materials
AreaProductionTechniques & repairPatterns & fitMaterials
Best forUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workStructured wool educationGenerating an editable custom-measurement blockTranslating the same fabric mass-per-area result between metric and U.S. customary listings
Know before usingAn orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.This is Woolmark-operated education focused on wool, not a neutral comparison of all fibres or processing systems. A completion badge records coursework, not independent proof of production competence, product performance, environmental impact, or compliance. Confirm technical values and local requirements against current standards before production use.A measurement-generated draft is a starting block, not independent evidence of body capture, comfort, mobility, balance, garment ease, or production fit. The result depends on measurement accuracy, supported ranges, formula assumptions, selected options, and output handling. Review the service's privacy terms before storing body data and sew a representative toile before design, grading, or production use.The result is a numerical unit conversion, not a new measurement or conformance decision; it does not establish sample or lot representativeness, significant digits, drape, warmth, opacity, thickness, stretch, strength, shrinkage, durability, sewability, end use, target, or tolerance.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsBothBothBoth
Location or jurisdictionGlobalGlobalGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessFree accountPaidOpen access
FormatStitch AuthorityReferenceSoftwareStitch Authority
Source typeStitch AuthorityIndustry organizationFirst-party platformStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesThe guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions.The current Woolmark Learning Centre library publishes free account-based coursework with module counts, completion times, progress tracking, knowledge checks, and supporting resources. Its wool programs cover fibre science, raw-wool and yarn processing, dyeing and finishing, woven textiles, knitwear, product quality, and wastewater management for learners and facilitators.PatternLab London's current drafting page says a user creates a measurement profile, selects a basic block or sloper, adjusts fit, dart placement, length, seam allowance, and sleeve options, then downloads the generated result as tiled PDF, AI, or SVG. The live catalogue names bodice, dress, trouser, and stretch blocks and displays a price before purchase.The calculator uses the NIST SP 811 Appendix B.8 conversion from avoirdupois ounces per square yard to kilograms per square metre and links to a source-reviewed fabric mass record for method, sampling, conditioning, and product controls.
Linked page reviewedJul 16, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueJul 16, 2027Jan 17, 2027Jan 17, 2027Jul 16, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.