The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessPEFC Find CertifiedGlobalRemoveOpen accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemoveFree accountThreadloop Sewing Pattern DatabaseGlobalRemoveFree + paidCrochet Guild of AmericaUnited States · North AmericaRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobCheck standardsSource productionFind patterns & fitLearn techniques
AreaStandardsProductionPatterns & fitTechniques & repair
Best forFinding or checking paper-based packaging and hangtag suppliers with PEFC chain-of-custody scopeUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workSearching current and out-of-print sewing patternsCrochet education and professional community
Know before usingA chain-of-custody record applies only to the named organization and scope; verify the exact product claim, current status, supplier role, artwork approval, and transaction documentation for each order.An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.Community members add and quality-control the records, so confirm sizing, measurements, fabric suggestions, format, availability, errata, license, and purchase terms with the designer or publisher. Adding an entry to a stash does not provide the pattern files. Saved searches and private PDF storage are paid Plus features, and a listing or review does not establish pattern accuracy or fit.Public pages explain the organization and calendar, while many classes, meetings, programs, and benefits require registration, payment, or membership. CGOA's statement that it sets a national standard is its own mission language, not evidence that every class, member, chapter, instructor, or portfolio is independently accredited, approved, or suitable for a particular learner.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsApparel brandsMakersMakers
Location or jurisdictionGlobalGlobalGlobalUnited States · North America
AccessOpen accessOpen accessFree accountFree + paid
FormatDirectoryStitch AuthorityCommunityCommunity
Source typeOfficial registryStitch AuthorityCommunity databaseIndustry organization
Source and review
What the source establishesPEFC describes the database as a current discovery and verification route for certified organizations, certificate validity, countries, product scope, sourcing, and due diligence.The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions.Threadloop's official guide describes an independent, fully crowdsourced database covering available and out-of-print sewing patterns. Its search supports pattern type, fabric type, age group, body type, cup size, level, format, file features, language, measurements, availability, and other filters; members can also track a stash, wishlist, projects, reviews, and discussions.CGOA's current public pages identify it as a volunteer-led nonprofit and describe online education, in-person and online events, local chapters, mentorship, scholarships, professional programming, and portfolio-based Masters skill-building programs. Its calendar distinguishes specific classes, meetings, retreats, and professional events.
Linked page reviewedJul 15, 2026Jul 16, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Next review dueOct 13, 2026Jul 16, 2027Jan 17, 2027Jan 17, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.