The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Download decision recordAdd or change routes →

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessHook & Needle Diameter ReferenceGlobalRemoveOpen accessPattern Test Brief TemplateGlobalRemoveFree + paidYarnpondGlobalRemoveOpen accessConstruction Classification & Callout Verification RecordGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobLearn techniquesFind patterns & fitFind patterns & fitSource production
AreaYarnPatterns & fitPatterns & fitProduction
Best forChecking which U.S. alias the current Craft Yarn Council table gives a known metric package size before confirming project gaugePlanning a sewing, knitting, or crochet pattern testRunning knit or crochet pattern testsUsing construction codes without treating classification as a machine setting, material assignment, supplier translation, or performance guarantee
Know before usingThe reference is not a dimensional measurement, manufacturer inspection, UK or Canadian conversion, steel-hook chart, tool recommendation, yarn assignment, gauge result, or proof that a proposed tool will produce the required fabric.The workflow is not a contract or quality certification; local legal duties and technical review may still apply.The platform is for knit and crochet rather than sewing, and a profile, application, rating, or platform listing does not prove technical competence, availability, identity, or fit for a project. Prices and plan limits can change. Define the test or edit scope, sizes, yarn, deadlines, compensation, confidentiality, intellectual property, file handling, expected feedback, and dispute process in writing before work starts.The record does not reproduce licensed code diagrams, verify a user's proposed code, authorize an ISO and ASTM crosswalk, select a construction, set stitch density or machine settings, prove supplier repeatability or performance, or replace the licensed standards and qualified construction, sewing, production, testing, safety, and quality review.
Practical access
ForMakersBothBothApparel brands
Location or jurisdictionGlobalGlobalGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessOpen accessFree + paidOpen access
FormatStitch AuthorityStitch AuthorityCommunityStitch Authority
Source typeStitch AuthorityStitch AuthorityFirst-party platformStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesThe lookup reproduces the current public Craft Yarn Council metric and U.S. alias rows and follows the Council's warning that company letter and number labels vary; blank aliases remain blank instead of being inferred.The linked tool or guide is maintained inside Stitch Authority and was checked against its current public interface.Yarnpond's current pages let knit and crochet designers publish public or private testing calls, select applicants, communicate with test teams, set milestones, collect feedback, post sample-making calls, and advertise tech-editing jobs. Testers can participate without charge, while designers pay per testing or job post or use a subscription, and tech editors maintain profiles and apply to posted work.The guide cites the current public scopes and statuses of ISO 4915:1991, ISO 4916:1991, and ASTM D6193-16(2025), plus current seam-failure and seam-tensile methods; it keeps classification, translation, complete process definition, physical verification, and performance evidence separate.
Linked page reviewedJul 16, 2026Jul 15, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueJul 16, 2027Jul 15, 2027Jan 17, 2027Jul 16, 2027
Inspect
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Source page ↗
Open record →Open resource →
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.