Compare two to four resources
Compare textile resources.
Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.
Selected resources
4 resources selected.
Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes
| Decision field | Free downloadAAFA Restricted Substance ListGlobalRemove | Open accessApparel Grade-Rule & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemove | Open accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemove | Open accessConstruction Classification & Callout Verification RecordGlobalRemove |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | ||||
| Primary job | Check standards | Find patterns & fit | Source production | Source production |
| Area | Standards | Patterns & fit | Production | Production |
| Best for | Surveying finished-product chemical regulations | Auditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidence | Understanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing work | Using construction codes without treating classification as a machine setting, material assignment, supplier translation, or performance guarantee |
| Know before using | AAFA provides the list for information only and says it is voluntary, may contain omissions or inaccuracies, and is not legal advice. A global most-restrictive value is not a complete market or product determination. Verify the current controlling law, jurisdiction, product and component scope, exemptions, effective dates, test method, sampling plan, brand requirements, manufacturing-input controls, and other safety rules. | The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review. | An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority. | The record does not reproduce licensed code diagrams, verify a user's proposed code, authorize an ISO and ASTM crosswalk, select a construction, set stitch density or machine settings, prove supplier repeatability or performance, or replace the licensed standards and qualified construction, sewing, production, testing, safety, and quality review. |
| Practical access | ||||
| For | Apparel brands | Apparel brands | Apparel brands | Apparel brands |
| Location or jurisdiction | Global | Global | Global | Global |
| Access | Free download | Open access | Open access | Open access |
| Format | Reference | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority |
| Source type | Industry organization | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority |
| Source and review | ||||
| What the source establishes | AAFA published RSL Version 26 on January 28, 2026 in searchable spreadsheet and PDF formats. The association describes it as a regularly updated reference to laws and regulations restricting chemicals in finished apparel, footwear, accessories, and home textiles. Its methodology records final-product or component limits, jurisdiction, test method, and comments, and excludes factory-process restrictions and non-chemical product-safety rules. | The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments. | The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions. | The guide cites the current public scopes and statuses of ISO 4915:1991, ISO 4916:1991, and ASTM D6193-16(2025), plus current seam-failure and seam-tensile methods; it keeps classification, translation, complete process definition, physical verification, and performance evidence separate. |
| Linked page reviewed | Jul 21, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
| Next review due | Oct 19, 2026 | Jul 16, 2027 | Jul 16, 2027 | Jul 16, 2027 |
| Inspect | ||||
How to compare
Use the rows to narrow your next check.
- Choose resources that could solve the same job.
- Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
- Read each limitation before following the source.
- Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.