Compare two to four resources
Compare textile resources.
Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.
Selected resources
4 resources selected.
Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes
| Decision field | Open accessTEXFOR Spanish Textile Member CompaniesSpain · European UnionRemove | Free accountFOURSOURCE Supplier NetworkGlobalRemove | Open accessApparel Grade-Rule & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemove | Open accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemove |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | ||||
| Primary job | Source production | Source production | Find patterns & fit | Source production |
| Area | Production | Production | Patterns & fit | Production |
| Best for | Identifying Spanish upstream material, trim, finishing, technical-textile, testing, and production leads by company name | Searching global apparel and textile production capabilities | Auditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidence | Understanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing work |
| Know before using | The page is a member-name gateway rather than a faceted capability database, and membership does not prove the exact process, material, minimum, certification, quality, capacity, traceability, price, labor conditions, or delivery needed for a project. | The company count is a changing platform claim. Search fields, profiles, certificates, locations, and account access do not independently verify the legal entity, factory ownership, capability, capacity, certificate validity or scope, compliance performance, delivery, or project fit. Confirm the site and subcontracting, credentials with issuers, samples, audits when appropriate, specifications, contracts, and commercial terms. | The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review. | An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority. |
| Practical access | ||||
| For | Apparel brands | Apparel brands | Apparel brands | Apparel brands |
| Location or jurisdiction | Spain · European Union | Global | Global | Global |
| Access | Open access | Free account | Open access | Open access |
| Format | Directory | Marketplace | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority |
| Source type | Industry organization | Commercial marketplace | Stitch Authority | Stitch Authority |
| Source and review | ||||
| What the source establishes | TEXFOR explains the national cotton, silk, knitting, and finishing associations integrated into the confederation and publishes a current public company list that includes mills, finishers, dyers, trim makers, technical-textile firms, laboratories, recyclers, and suppliers. | FOURSOURCE's current public network page presents an operator-reported global company count and country or territory search. It says logged-in users can narrow results by compliance certificates, product groups, fabric types, target groups, minimum order quantities, and other fields, with a free-trial and supplier sign-up route. | The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments. | The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions. |
| Linked page reviewed | Jul 15, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
| Next review due | Jan 11, 2027 | Jan 17, 2027 | Jul 16, 2027 | Jul 16, 2027 |
| Inspect | ||||
How to compare
Use the rows to narrow your next check.
- Choose resources that could solve the same job.
- Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
- Read each limitation before following the source.
- Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.