The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

3 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 3 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessApparel Grade-Rule & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemoveOpen accessYarnSubGlobalRemoveOpen accessEU ESCO Apparel Patternmaker ProfileEuropean UnionRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobFind patterns & fitChoose materialsFind patterns & fit
AreaPatterns & fitYarnPatterns & fit
Best forAuditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidenceReplacing a discontinued or unavailable yarnMapping multilingual patternmaker role names and competency terms when writing job briefs, comparing training language, or searching European labor information
Know before usingThe record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review.A suggested match is a data-based shortlist, not proof that the yarn suits the pattern or maker. Yarn records can be incomplete or wrong, prices and availability vary by market, and the site uses affiliate links. Confirm the required gauge, total length, fibre behavior, construction, care, color, dye lot, accessibility, and seller terms, then make and assess a representative swatch before committing.ESCO is a multilingual classification and terminology source, not a practitioner directory, professional license, regulated-status determination, qualification, competence assessment, provider approval, hiring recommendation, or evidence of individual experience. A linked skill does not establish proficiency, scope, availability, price, or project fit. Confirm the current ESCO version, local occupation and regulation context, role responsibilities, portfolio, references, systems, deliverables, rights, and acceptance evidence independently.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsMakersApparel brands
Location or jurisdictionGlobalGlobalEuropean Union
AccessOpen accessOpen accessOpen access
FormatStitch AuthorityReferenceReference
Source typeStitch AuthorityFirst-party platformOfficial registry
Source and review
What the source establishesThe guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments.YarnSub's official FAQ says its matching software compares gauge, texture, yarn weight and density, fibre content, and fibre qualities such as drape and softness. Discontinued yarns remain searchable as starting points but are excluded from suggested replacements, and each yarn page provides a route to report source-data problems.The European Commission's ESCO service publishes released occupation 7532.7, wearing apparel patternmaker, with preferred labels in 28 languages. Its profile describes interpreting design sketches, cutting patterns, meeting customer requirements, and producing samples, prototypes, and size series. The API links 21 essential skills or knowledge areas, including creating and grading garment patterns, standard sizing systems, apparel manufacturing technology, CAD, pattern-cutting software, alterations, technical drawings, fabric distinction, and apparel inspection, plus five optional areas including 3D body scanners and scan analysis.
Linked page reviewedJul 16, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueJul 16, 2027Jan 17, 2027Oct 14, 2026
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.