The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

3 resources selected.

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 3 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldOpen accessAustralia Care Labelling OverviewAustralia · OceaniaRemoveOpen accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemoveFree accountThreadloop Sewing Pattern DatabaseGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobCheck standardsSource productionFind patterns & fit
AreaStandardsProductionPatterns & fit
Best forGetting an accessible Australian care-labelling overview before opening the registered legal instrument and any incorporated standard needed for the productUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workSearching current and out-of-print sewing patterns
Know before usingThe ACCC explicitly describes this page as an overview that suppliers must not use as a complete compliance guide. It is not the registered instrument or the full licensed text of AS/NZS 1957:1998 or ISO 3758:2012, and it does not classify a product, select or approve instructions, or cover fibre content, origin, children's nightwear, chemicals, general product safety, every state or territory issue, or legal advice. Check the current instrument, exact product scope and exemptions, incorporated text, label execution, related rules, records, and enforcement guidance before supply.An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.Community members add and quality-control the records, so confirm sizing, measurements, fabric suggestions, format, availability, errata, license, and purchase terms with the designer or publisher. Adding an entry to a stash does not provide the pattern files. Saved searches and private PDF storage are paid Plus features, and a listing or review does not establish pattern accuracy or fit.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsApparel brandsMakers
Location or jurisdictionAustralia · OceaniaGlobalGlobal
AccessOpen accessOpen accessFree account
FormatReferenceStitch AuthorityCommunity
Source typeGovernment guidanceStitch AuthorityCommunity database
Source and review
What the source establishesThe Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Product Safety page identifies the Consumer Goods (Care Labelling) Information Standard 2023 as the mandatory rule for prescribed clothing, household textiles, furnishings, bedding, piece goods, textile yarns, leather, fur, and other listed goods. It publishes the main exclusions, states that suppliers may use English care instructions, the five internationally recognised care symbols, or both, and links the registered instrument and explanatory statement. It also states that the rule draws on specified parts of AS/NZS 1957:1998 and ISO 3758:2012 and that non-compliance can lead to penalties or a recall obligation.The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions.Threadloop's official guide describes an independent, fully crowdsourced database covering available and out-of-print sewing patterns. Its search supports pattern type, fabric type, age group, body type, cup size, level, format, file features, language, measurements, availability, and other filters; members can also track a stash, wishlist, projects, reviews, and discussions.
Linked page reviewedJul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Next review dueOct 19, 2026Jul 16, 2027Jan 17, 2027
Inspect
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.