The Authority SuiteRuck AuthorityKit AuthorityAperture AuthoritySprout AuthorityDrone AuthorityHouse Pet Authority
Compare two to four resources

Compare textile resources.

Review access, scope, source evidence, and limitations side by side before choosing what to inspect next.

Selected resources

4 resources selected.

Download decision recordAdd or change routes →

Swipe the table sideways to inspect all 4 routes

Side-by-side evidence and decision metadata for selected textile resources.
Decision fieldFree downloadAAFA Restricted Substance ListGlobalRemoveFree + paidMaker’s RowUnited States · North AmericaRemoveOpen accessControlled Tech Pack OrientationGlobalRemoveOpen accessApparel Grade-Rule & Size-Run Validation RecordGlobalRemove
Decision fit
Primary jobCheck standardsSource productionSource productionFind patterns & fit
AreaStandardsProductionProductionPatterns & fit
Best forSurveying finished-product chemical regulationsFinding US production partnersUnderstanding what a tech pack must control before using a template or releasing workAuditing inherited grade rules or controlling a new multi-size pattern release from approved targets through sample evidence
Know before usingAAFA provides the list for information only and says it is voluntary, may contain omissions or inaccuracies, and is not legal advice. A global most-restrictive value is not a complete market or product determination. Verify the current controlling law, jurisdiction, product and component scope, exemptions, effective dates, test method, sampling plan, brand requirements, manufacturing-input controls, and other safety rules.A factory profile, platform label, bid, estimate, or message does not establish current identity, factory ownership, capability, capacity, workmanship, pricing, compliance, delivery, or project fit. Paid-plan visibility can affect who responds. Verify the production site, subcontracting, references, samples, quality and compliance records, specifications, commercial terms, and remedies directly.An orientation rather than a completed product record; it does not supply a universal format, licensed standard content, measurements, tolerances, construction settings, labels, approvals, compliance conclusion, or product-release authority.The record does not create a production grade, supply universal increments or breakpoints, validate a CAD file or fit population, reproduce licensed standards, or replace qualified anthropometric, pattern, technical-design, fit, quality, accessibility, safety, statistical, and user-research review.
Practical access
ForApparel brandsApparel brandsApparel brandsApparel brands
Location or jurisdictionGlobalUnited States · North AmericaGlobalGlobal
AccessFree downloadFree + paidOpen accessOpen access
FormatReferenceMarketplaceStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source typeIndustry organizationCommercial marketplaceStitch AuthorityStitch Authority
Source and review
What the source establishesAAFA published RSL Version 26 on January 28, 2026 in searchable spreadsheet and PDF formats. The association describes it as a regularly updated reference to laws and regulations restricting chemicals in finished apparel, footwear, accessories, and home textiles. Its methodology records final-product or component limits, jurisdiction, test method, and comments, and excludes factory-process restrictions and non-chemical product-safety rules.Maker's Row currently lets a brand submit a project before advance sign-up, then provides access to an account. Its project workflow records product details and files and connects projects with factories by location and specialty. Search guidance lists apparel capabilities such as pattern making, sourcing, sample making, and production. Factory access to bids is plan-dependent.The guide cites current ISO sources for documented-information, garment-measurement, stitch, and seam boundaries plus current U.S. FTC textile and care-labeling guidance; it explicitly separates those authorities from product-specific technical and market decisions.The guide cites current ISO body-table, size-designation, and garment-measurement boundaries plus two peer-reviewed studies that tested the relationship between conventional grade rules, anthropometric evidence, and garment fit; it requires product-specific target deltas and validation instead of publishing universal increments.
Linked page reviewedJul 21, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Next review dueOct 19, 2026Jan 17, 2027Jul 16, 2027Jul 16, 2027
Inspect
Open record →Source page ↗
Open record →Source page ↗
Open record →Open resource →
Open record →Open resource →
How to compare

Use the rows to narrow your next check.

  1. Choose resources that could solve the same job.
  2. Eliminate access, scope, or jurisdiction mismatches.
  3. Read each limitation before following the source.
  4. Verify project-specific claims with the source or provider.